KE
Kosmos Energy Ltd. (KOS)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 was operationally stronger (production +3% q/q to ~65.5k boepd; GTA ramp-up and Jubilee well added ~10k bopd), but financially soft: revenue $311.2M, adjusted EPS -$0.15, GAAP EPS -$0.26 due largely to Winterfell-4 write-off and higher exploration expense .
- Versus consensus, Kosmos missed on revenue ($311.2M vs $354.1M*) and EPS (-$0.15 vs -$0.134*), marking the third straight quarter of top- and bottom-line shortfalls; cost control improved (production expense down ~39% q/q, cost/boe down to $26.78) and EBITDAX remained positive . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Guidance trimmed: FY production to ~65k boepd (from 65–70k), G&A lowered to ~$75M, CapEx cut to < $350M, net interest expense raised to ~$220M; Q4 production guided at 66–72k boepd as GTA targets nameplate and second Jubilee producer comes online .
- Balance sheet actions: $250M Shell term loan (first $150M used post quarter to partially redeem 2026 notes), RBL redetermination completed with borrowing base > $1.35B facility; hedges expanded to 8.5MM bbls in 2026 (floor ~$66) to stabilize near-term cash flows .
- Potential stock catalysts: sustained GTA nameplate volumes, Jubilee well delivery cadence, TEN FPSO purchase to lower OpEx, and secured debt options against GTA to address 2027 maturities .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- GTA ramped materially: 6.8 gross LNG cargos in Q3; 13.5 cargos through October and first condensate cargo lifted, with path to nameplate by year-end and unit costs targeted to fall >50% in 2026 .
- Jubilee execution: first producer of 2025/26 campaign averaged ~10k bopd gross; rig spud second producer in mid-October with more wells scheduled into 2026; OBN seismic to enhance future well placement .
- Costs trending down: production expense fell to $148M (ex-GTA $19.51/boe), CapEx $67M below guidance; overhead reductions on-track for $25M by year-end .
“Through rising production and this focus on costs, we expect unit costs to fall by over 50% next year.” — Andrew Inglis, CEO .
What Went Wrong
- Gulf of America setback: Winterfell-4 abandoned due to casing collapse, triggering ~$51.1M write-off; 2026 activity refocused on restoring Winterfell-3 fault block .
- Higher exploration and interest costs pressured earnings: exploration expenses rose to $54.9M; interest and financing costs $57.9M in Q3 .
- Free cash flow negative in Q3 (-$98.9M) on working capital draw tied to GTA Phase 1 completion; operating cash flow -$27.6M, liquidity ~$540M at quarter-end .
Financial Results
Core metrics vs prior quarters
Actual vs S&P Global consensus and surprise
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Segment and operational breakdown (Q3 2025)
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We set out this year with three clear priorities: Increase production, reduce costs and enhance the resilience of the balance sheet… we have continued to make good progress against each of these priorities.” — Andrew Inglis, CEO .
- “Operating costs were down almost 40% quarter on quarter… CapEx of $67 million came in lower than guidance… full-year CapEx below our $350 million forecast.” — Neal Shah, CFO .
- “We now have 8.5 million barrels of oil hedged next year, with a floor of $66 and a ceiling of $73 per barrel.” — Neal Shah, CFO .
- “We expect unit costs to fall by over 50% next year [at GTA]… we continue to advance Phase 1+ targeting online in 2029.” — Andrew Inglis, CEO .
- “We plan to focus next year's activity on restoring production from the Winterfell #3-#4 block… lessons learned: keep it simple, rigorous planning and execution.” — Andrew Inglis, CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- TEN FPSO purchase: Structure aims for no additional payments until a discounted buyout in 2027; lease is >60% of TEN OpEx; expected to materially lower OpEx post purchase .
- GTA OpEx trajectory: Quarterly OpEx net to Kosmos trending ~$70M (Q2) → ~$60M (Q3) → ~$50M (Q4 midpoint); targeting ~$6/MMBtu break-even and lower in 2026 .
- Winterfell lessons: Operational issues (screen pack-off, casing collapse) vs reservoir; 2026 plan refocused on a simple recompletion to restore production .
- Condensate cargo treatment: First cargo lifted by partnership; Kosmos receives pro-rata cash flow in Q4; future liftings to alternate among partners/NOCs .
- Covenants/liquidity tests: Waiver to 4.0x for September test; year-end test 4.25x using Dec 31 financials; mitigation options in-flight; liquidity test for 2027s passed .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025: Revenue $311.2M vs $354.1M consensus (miss), EPS -$0.15 vs -$0.134 consensus (miss). Prior quarters also missed on both metrics (Q2: -$4.8M revenue, -$0.102 EPS; Q1: -$28.8M revenue, -$0.1425 EPS). Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Estimate revisions likely to reflect lower FY production (
65k boepd), higher net interest ($220M), and lower FY CapEx (<$350M), with improving unit costs and growing volumes into 2026 as GTA reaches nameplate and Jubilee adds wells .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Production trajectory is upward: GTA approaching nameplate and Jubilee well cadence should lift volumes sequentially through 2026, supporting EBITDAX and cash generation .
- Cost base is improving: OpEx per boe fell to $26.78; management targets >50% GTA unit cost reduction in 2026; TEN FPSO purchase should structurally reduce OpEx .
- Near-term FCF remains sensitive to cargo timing and oil prices; hedging (floors ~$62 in 2025, ~$66 in 2026) provides downside protection while CapEx and overhead cuts improve resilience .
- Balance sheet de-risking: $250M Shell loan addresses 2026 notes; secured options vs GTA contemplated for 2027s; RBL base remains > facility size .
- Watch for delivery milestones: GTA nameplate attainment, Jubilee second producer online by year-end, pump repairs in EG, and TEN FPSO transaction signing — each could catalyze sentiment .
- Risk flags: Operational execution in GOM (Winterfell remediation) and covenant headroom into the year-end test; management indicated active mitigations .
- Medium-term thesis: With Phase 1+ low-capex expansion (domestic gas) and potential Gimi debottlenecking (10–20% LNG increment), Kosmos can expand throughput with limited capital, improving unit economics by 2029 .